A Comparison of James Polk and Abraham Lincoln's War Decisions

The President's Job During War Time

--One of decision and occasional unpopularity
A Learning On-Line Resource Page by Howard Taylor

In this small informational website, I would like to take us to three historical periods in U.S. History.  There seems to be some similarities in the three Presidents and their careers.  All Presidents who have been involved in a war, would relate to these three Presidents as well.

1 . . . James Polk, 1844 :  Polk Family Homestead Website
James Polk was elected President in 1844.  He would be one of the hardest working Presidents we would have.  He was Democrat, and promised he would serve only one term.   His biggest historical legacy is the great expansion of our country.  This very expansion effort by Polk and our government would get him into contention with certain political elements of our country, including the young U.S. Representative, Abraham Lincoln.  His family homestead website biography describes the political turmoil and the War with Mexico that occurred during Polk's administration:
During his Presidential campaign. . .

". . .Polk promised to actively encourage America's westward expansion. He favored Texas statehood and the acquisition of the Oregon Territory. Although critics expressed concern that aggressive expansionism might lead to a war with Great Britain or Mexico and might destroy the tenuous balance between free states and slave states, a majority of Americans accepted Polk's vision of a continental nation."

Slavery was the big issue, and the expansion of it into new U.S. territories was feared by
anti-slavery folks in the North and even the South (smaller number).

Polk declared war on Mexico over territorial rights and an attack on Gen. Zackary Taylor's troops.  Abraham Lincoln would oppose this was while a representative.  This was not a popular political thing for the young Lincoln to do.  Check here for a learning activity on the Mexican War and Lincoln's opposition.

2 (1844, continued) Abraham Lincoln, Freshman U.S. Representative:
. . . The new U.S. Representative Abraham Lincoln was against the Mexican War and put his own political career on the line with his inward concern of slavery expanding to new territories to be gained from the war.  Here's what Abraham Lincoln had to say and did concerning his anti-war actions:
Representative Lincoln introduced to Congress a series of resolutions designed to embarrass the president by forcing him to admit that Mexico and not the U.S. had jurisdiction over the spot where blood was first shed. When Polk had delivered his war message he had claimed that American blood had been shed on American soil.  Lincoln questioned whether Mexico had jurisdiction over the spot where blood was shed, and if they did, they had the right to eject American soldiers from their soil. Thus Polk had provoked war by placing soldiers on Mexican soil in order to achieve some greater objective, such as expanding slavery.

The Legislative Branch has the responsibility to maintain the balance of power between it (Legislative Branch), and the Executive and Judicial branches.  In this bit of U.S. History, President Polk is the leader who is questioned and criticized by a group.  It just happens that Abraham Lincoln is the questioner.

Let's travel to a different time now-- 1861, Abraham Lincoln, President!

3 President Abraham Lincoln has entered office in a time of great turmoil.  If you study his political career, especially from the 1850's to his election as President, you can see that he had a master plan to be President, keep the Union together, and rid it of slavery.  He was elected President, but not because of Southern popularity.  The Southern states, that would first secede would only wait until Lincoln was formally elected and then they seceded.  Lincoln did not ever consider secession as a real possibility.  He maintained in his speeches that the Union would come back as one, either all slave or not-slave.
The Civil War would start, and many in office, especially the Southern sympathizers would question and criticize his role in starting the Civil War.  Time goes on again.  Lincoln would be the criticizer of Polk, but during the Civil War, he would become the criticized.

Let's travel to present day in the old U.S.--  Spring, 2006
4 ...George W. Bush, Spring, 2006
. . . our 43rd President.  His election alone was with turmoil, in the actual physical election process, problems arose.  He was elected and then the terrible act on 9/11/01.  George W. Bush was pushed into a full-fledged wartime President, who would have to take hold of the government and the people in leadership and courage.  He became, and still is very popular.
As now during Spring of 2006,  Sept. 12, 2002, the President is entering the 4th year of a now unpopular war with Iraq to help that country to become a democracy.  The President, whether popular or unpopular has to make the decisions, and the buck stops at his desk. 

Time goes on, and on and on. Big Decisions are made daily by the President.

Only history after the fact can reveal whether decisions are right.

What do you think?

Return to My Learning On-Line Resources